Fix 'be be' constructs #57295
Merged
Fix 'be be' constructs #57295
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I noticed a duplicated "be" somewhere in the code. A search for it manifested a couple more locations with the same problem. This change removes one of the "be"s.
|
r? @zackmdavis (rust_highfive has picked a reviewer for you, use r? to override) |
rust-highfive
added
the
S-waiting-on-review
|
I'm surprised that not only were there three of these, but that all instances had both be's on the same line! I would have expected this class of copyediting error to be easier to slip through around a line break, as in the famous "illusion" where people have a very hard time seeing what's wrong with this text: (I suppose the text could have been re-wrapped after it was first written.) ... oh, wait. Actually, if you found these using In any case, thanks! @bors r+ rollup |
|
📌 Commit a944ecf has been approved by |
bors
added
S-waiting-on-bors
Mark-Simulacrum
added a commit
to Mark-Simulacrum/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 3, 2019
Fix 'be be' constructs I noticed a duplicated "be" somewhere in the code. A search for it manifested a couple more locations with the same problem. This change removes one of the "be"s.
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2019
Fix 'be be' constructs I noticed a duplicated "be" somewhere in the code. A search for it manifested a couple more locations with the same problem. This change removes one of the "be"s.
kennytm
added a commit
to kennytm/rust
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2019
Fix repeated word typos Inspired by rust-lang#57295 (I skipped 'be be' because of it) and my [PR in another repo ](cp-algorithms/cp-algorithms#389) Not a stupid `sed`, I actually tried to fix case by case.
bors
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Jan 5, 2019
Rollup of 17 pull requests Successful merges: - #57219 (Remove some unused code) - #57229 (Fix #56806 by using `delay_span_bug` in object safety layout sanity checks) - #57233 (Rename and fix nolink-with-link-args test) - #57238 (Fix backtraces for inlined functions on Windows) - #57249 (Fix broken links to second edition TRPL.) - #57267 (src/jemalloc is gone, remove its mention from COPYRIGHT) - #57273 (Update the stdsimd submodule) - #57278 (Add Clippy to config.toml.example) - #57295 (Fix 'be be' constructs) - #57311 (VaList::copy should not require a mutable ref) - #57312 (`const fn` is no longer coming soon (const keyword docs)) - #57313 (Improve Box<T> -> Pin<Box<T>> conversion) - #57314 (Fix repeated word typos) - #57326 (Doc rewording, use the same name `writer`) - #57338 (rustdoc: force binary filename for compiled doctests) - #57342 (librustc_mir: Make qualify_min_const_fn module public) - #57343 (Calculate privacy access only via query) Failed merges: - #57340 (Use correct tracking issue for c_variadic) r? @ghost
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I noticed a duplicated "be" somewhere in the code. A search for it
manifested a couple more locations with the same problem. This change
removes one of the "be"s.